UNCORRECTED DRAFT
for
private circulation only
Tertiary
Education Today:
Global
Trends, Global Agendas, Global Constraints
Wadi D. Haddad, Ph.D
President, Knowledge
Enterprise, Inc. (USA)
Whaddad@KnowledgeEnterprise.org
presented 19 August 2003
at the ICETE International
Consultation for Theological Educators
High Wycombe, UK
Countries are facing daunting
challenges in the global environment that have significant implications for
human development, some universal and some unique to developing countries.
These challenges have raised serious questions about the purpose, mode and operation
of tertiary education, and are leading to earnest political, structural,
institutional and instructional dialogue, readjustment and transformation.
Tertiary education today, like many other economic and societal sectors, is in a state of disequilibrium, flux and dynamic evolution – amplified by its multifaceted nature, the diversity of its providers and clients, and the multiplicity of its stakeholders. The tertiary education institutions find themselves, to varying degrees, at the point of convergence of three very powerful factors: global trends, global agendas and global constraints:
At the start of the 21st
century, countries are faced with significant shifts in the global economic environment
characterized by three major developments: changing patterns of trade and
competition, technological innovation and globalization of information. These
shifts have two implications.
First, Nations will be
operating in a global marketplace where competition spans national borders.
They will be more interdependent, more susceptible to external economic shocks,
and more vulnerable to international changes in demand for types and quality of
products; it also makes it hard to predict the skills that will be needed in
the future.
Second, the opening of
economies to competition in conjunction with rapid technological change is also
affecting modes of production. Industrialized countries with which developing
countries are competing are moving away from mass production toward high
performance systems, and are compensating for high wages with improved
productivity. The production of manufacturing and high-valued services no
longer filter down “naturally” from high-income to middle-and low-income countries
based on labor costs alone. New goods, such as consumer electronics and new
processes such as computer-assisted manufacturing have created a new reality:
The location of manufacturing and high-value service depends on the producer’s
ability to control quality, and
manage flexible, information-based systems. In addition, information can now be
collected, analyzed and communicated with increasing speed through dramatic
innovations in information technology, rapid international communication and
transportation capacity, and massive technological connections across national
boundaries. An important implication of
this is that any service that can be digitized and transmitted can be produced
and sold anywhere, e.g., computer programming, banking, back-office
operations. Whole new industries will
arise from cheap and fast communications.
Firms in industrialized countries will subcontract more services around
the world.
These facts change the rules
of the game for the economic success of developing countries. As new
technologies and production processes transform the international economy, the
future of individual nations in world development hinges much more than even a
generation ago on the capacity to acquire, transmit and apply knowledge to work
in everyday life, and produce according to international standards. They can no
longer rely on a low-wage edge; industry in such countries will have to develop
and mature technologically and managerially and will need to place a greater
emphasis on productivity, quality and flexibility in production.
To summarize: Together, the
significant changes in economic and technological developments are producing a
new worldwide economy that is global, high speed, knowledge driven,
disciplinarian, and competitive. Countries have to meet the competitiveness
challenge in terms of agility, networking and learning, and to arrange
production to achieve quality, productivity and flexibility. The good news is that, with the potential of
human development and advanced technologies, developing countries can
leapfrog. The bad news is that this
process is not automatic. On the
contrary, unless conscious efforts are made, countries are unlikely to be able to
adapt to the demands of globalized economy.
They may even experience, on one hand, displacement of workers who lack
the necessary skills and the prerequisite general education to learn new skills
rapidly, and, on the other hand, a shortage of qualified workers for the new
industries and modes of production.
Generation, selection,
assimilation, and application of knowledge are fundamental to the economic
growth and well being of any modern society. According to a recent OECD study,
“underlying long-term growth rates in OECD economies depend on maintaining and
expanding the knowledge base.” The World Bank World Development Report
1998/1999 concurred stating that “today’s most technologically advanced
economies are truly knowledge-based.”
So, economic growth today is a combination of capital accumulation and
knowledge accumulation. Knowledge also
plays a crucial role in resolving social problems related to areas such as
health (including HIV/AIDS), water supply and conservation, energy generation
and utilization, food security, and environmental protection.
In fact, all facets of
society are becoming knowledge dependent. The very participation in a modern
technological world necessitates a significant level of scientific and
technological understanding. This applies to all areas of everyday living,
including banking, business transactions, health services, transportation
vehicles, home appliances, utilities, communication and information exchange.
Without the essential knowledge and skills for modern living, people will
remain on the margins of society, and society itself will lose their vast
potential contributions.
Knowledge, both basic and
applied, is being generated very fast and is growing exponentially. More new information has been produced within
the last three decades, than in the last five millennia. We should be poised for dramatic
technological advances and break-throughs in the macro-frontiers of the
universe on the one hand, and microscopic secrets of the human body on the
other hand – and everything in between.
We will witness exponential (and sometimes incredible) advances in all
areas, including cosmology, particle physics, chemistry, bioengineering,
computer science, genetics and neuroscience. But not all generated knowledge is
at the sophisticated levels, we should expect similar developments in areas
related to everyday life and to the marketplace.
As rapidly as knowledge is
being generated, there are growing means by which to disseminate that knowledge
through printed, audio, video and electronic media. The revolution in
information and communication technologies (ICTs) has made access to
information less expensive, more feasible and nearly universal.
Unfortunately, though, most
developing countries are behind on both the generation of and access to
knowledge. While modern technologies are broadening the knowledge base in high
and middle income countries and transforming their economies and societies,
they are increasing the marginalization of low income countries and
communities. The digital divide among and within nations is real and
intensifying.
There is a growing
consciousness all over the world about such issues as democracy, citizen
empowerment, freedom of communication, culture, civic participation, gender
equity, human rights, civil justice, peace, and general quality of life.
Likewise, development goals
are no more restricted to economic growth. The International Development Goals
(IDGs) target “a world free of poverty and free of the misery that poverty
breeds.” The goals are set in terms of reducing poverty, improving health and
education, and protecting the environment. They have been adopted by the World
Bank, the International Monetary Fund, members of the Development Assistance
Committee of the OECD, and many other agencies. They found a new expression in
the Millennium Declaration of the United Nations, adopted by the General
Assembly in September 2000.
A major challenge in the face
of existing and potential strife, exploitation, and human rights violations is
to instill in the minds of citizens at all levels the principles of tolerance,
democracy, human rights, responsibility, accountability, and peace—among countries,
within countries, and among people. “Since wars begin in the minds of men, it
is in the minds of men that the defenses of peace must be constructed”
(Preamble to UNESCO’s constitution). Meanwhile, and despite advances in
health and medicine, massive human suffering continues due to ravaging
diseases, bad health conditions, lack of understanding of health issues, and
limited use of health services.
The challenges of social
development, conflict resolution, peace, and better quality of life are not
only formidable, but they belong to a category with which we do not have much
experience. Unlike economic development, physical construction, and
technological advancement, these challenges are not straightforward. Many of
their elements are contextual, fluid, and controversial. It is in the interest
of everybody (governments, businesses, communities, etc.) to draw on the best
minds, approaches, and technologies, to face this challenge and create stable
societies that are essential for political sustainability, social development,
and economic prosperity.
Global media and ICTs have
the capacity to enhance two cultural developments:
“International
culture” – We are witnessing three
major developments:
the
near universal availability of a wide range of powerful media, including
television, literature, cinema, music videos, internet and other digital
technologies;
the
presence of a strong cultural content to these technologies dominated by rich
and powerful entities manifested by Hollywood, BBC, CNN, Disney and the like;
and
free
global flow of information and culture leading to common concerns, shared
values, and enhanced social discernment.
These
developments are creating a unique international culture that is global in nature,
a belonging to a “global village”, and a virtual identity that is seemingly
neutral vis-à-vis traditional identities (state, ethnicity, religion, etc...)
This media-enhanced culture offers people (particularly the youth) the
opportunity to come into contact with other cultures without leaving home and
to belong to “interest communities” without leaving one’s own.
Extended
home culture – The same technologies
have the capacity to enhance and promote dominant domestic cultures as well as
sub-cultures in the home country and abroad. It is estimated that more than 100
million people live outside their country of origin. As a result, the cities
all over the world have become multicultural, and homogeneous populations are
now experiencing a significant infusion of cultural, ethnic, and language
diversity. Migration is expected to
increase in the years ahead due to rapid globalization of the economy and
easing of barriers. This mobility is transforming societies and creating
Diasporas that are struggling with cultural identity. These Diasporas can now
remain connected with their original cultures through mass media and ICTs.
Experiencing these two
cultural developments is exciting and enriching. However, it may lead to an identity
crisis created by an apparent conflict between the present cultural identity
and the foreign cultural forces and cultures to which one is exposed. Some make
a clear-cut decision; they either adhere to their original culture and resist
any influences that they perceive to be in conflict with it, or endorse the
dominant international culture in its entirety – or at least its behavioral
manifestations. Most people, however, go through an auto-equilibration process.
When they are exposed to new cultural elements, they experience disequilibrium
– an internal conflict of ideas and belonging. They then go through cycles of
analysis, adjustment, partial assimilation, testing – until they reach a new
internal cultural equilibrium with which they are comfortable. The result is a
new identity mutation.
This process of mutation is
difficult in cultures dominated by the concept of unitary identity. In most
countries, though, multiple-identity is a well accepted and practiced concept.
A person does not belong to one exclusive set, but to an intersection of many
sets – state, culture, ethnicity, religion, gender, profession, etc… So there
is, for instance, a composite identity of an
Arab-American-Christian-woman-lawyer. The important issue here is not only the
defined boundaries between cultural communities, but also the relative
strengths of simultaneous belongings to different communities. In such an
environment, the process of auto-equilibration, identity mutation, and even the
acquisition of additional identities becomes a lifelong process.
The impact of global media on
the process of identity conflict and mutation is moderated and constrained by
other cultural sources – local, domestic, regional and transnational. First,
global media are not monolithic nor do they promote one and consistent message;
they carry different and conflicting messages. Second, contextual factors such
as social pressure for conformity, state structures, economic incentives,
communal connections, societal attitude towards cultural diversity, and
education, constrain, dilute or reinforce the impact of global media.
There is now a solid
recognition among decision-makers and beneficiaries alike that education is
crucial for economic development, human welfare, societal advancement and
environmental protection. Looking into
the future the demand for education is going to escalate.
We have already entered the
21st century with a basic education deficiency gap of an estimated
50 million children out of school and about 850 million illiterate youths and
adults. Equally pressing will be the demand for higher levels of education,
triggered by more completers of first-level education, higher ambitions of
parents and students, and more sophisticated requirements of the marketplace.
As developing countries are forced to compete with more developed countries in
a competitive knowledge-based global economy, they are far behind in providing
educational opportunities at the post-basic levels. Moreover, the fast changes in knowledge and skills will require
further education, upgrading, and reorientation of a significant segment of the
population. If only 10% of the adult population needs such educational
services, we are talking about more than 300 million participants.
In two regions of the world,
Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East and North Africa, the demand education
is further compounded by demographic trends that further tax the limited
resources.
The relationship between the
marketplace, the state and tertiary education sector is evolving significantly.
Education is no longer a
monopoly of the state or a “protected industry.” Local and transnational
private entities have entered this field as a result of expanding economic
liberalism, increasing political pluralism and rising demand for tertiary
education as discussed above.
Government funding has not been able to cope with the evolving demands
and new providers have entered the market in large numbers. In fact, the growth
of private institutions in developing countries has been more rapid than in
OECD countries. For instance, private tertiary education institutions grew in
Sub-Saharan Africa from an estimated 30 in 1990 to more than 85in 1999. A large
number of the new providers are
private, non-governmental institutions, many of them being established in
partnership with American or European institutions of higher learning, and most
are profit-driven and therefore, accessible only to those who can afford them.
ICTs have facilitated this
trend. ICTs allow for flow of information and educational services across
borders and over geographic and social barriers. Open and virtual universities
and high schools as well as internet-based lifelong educational programs have simultaneously
internationalized and decentralized education. Education and training can now
be practiced by anyone, anytime, anywhere.
The above five global trends pose serious challenges and vital questions for the planning of tertiary education and training, and are forcing a rethinking in the way tertiary education is perceived and managed and in the priorities, scale, size and speed of its development. Business as usual will not suffice. This may place some countries at risk of not developing their human capital to a threshold necessary for poverty reduction, and economic and social development. Such countries may find themselves marginalized in an age of globalized economy and knowledge. Similarly, tertiary education institutions may find themselves outdated, serving another set of demands for another age.
Where does this leave tertiary education development? Governments, institutions and professionals are struggling with five far- reaching agenda items:
There was a time when
planning for education and training was a straightforward exercise: manpower
planners would map out needs of different sectors of the economy with
reasonable precision, classify corresponding jobs by level, define skill
requirements for each job, and, subsequently, project the manpower needs. Then
it was fairly easy for educational planners to take this “dependable”
information and build on it when devising education and training programs.
The workforce of the future will
need a whole spectrum of knowledge and skills to deal with technology and the
globalization of knowledge. It also
will need to be agile and flexible, to adjust to continuous changes, both
economic and social. This means that
countries must embrace a holistic and radical approach to tertiary education.
There is an educational pressing need for:
·
a workforce that has the
foundation to enhance the quality and efficiency of product development, production,
and maintenance, and the flexibility to acquire the new skills required for new
jobs; and
·
a cadre of highly
trained scientific, technological, and processing personnel, including some
with sophisticated research skills, who can understand fully material,
scientific, technological, managerial, and social developments, and who can
take the lead in their assessment, adaptation, and local application.
But the process never ends. The economic and social
challenges require a system that provides opportunities for lifelong learning
to help individuals, families, work-places and communities to adapt to economic
and societal changes. There are compelling reasons for this:
Rapid
technological change and growth in knowledge and information will require constant
learning;
As
society evolves, we are unlikely to continue the present “life-cycle” pattern
of prolonged education at the beginning of life, and an extended retirement
period at the end; and
Lifelong
learning provides opportunities for those who are unemployed to re-enter the
workforce;
As a result, tertiary
education institutions have to practice a balancing act:
Disciplinary
versus multidisciplinary approaches
Academic
excellence versus social action
Dissemination
versus generation of knowledge
More
education for more people versus specialized education for fewer people
Local
relevance versus international standards
The link between education
and development is not the certificate or the degree; it is actual
learning. In addition, the question is
not limited anymore to what to teach and learn but extends to how to
teach and learn; how to problem-solve and synthesize the old with the
new. To have these results, education
must be engaging and authentic.
Engaging in the sense that student are involved in the learning process,
and not viewed simply a “receptacle” for knowledge; authentic in the sense that
what the students are learning has meaning to them as an individuals, members
of society, and workers in the market place.
The value of certification
may be diminishing. Certification of individuals has been very important in the
public sector which cannot tolerate discretion in evaluating candidates for
employment. As the private sector becomes the prime employer in the economies
of the future, what university graduates have in terms of knowledge, skills and
cognitive/social competences will have more value than a mere certificate.
Tertiary education
institutions will not enjoy anymore the protection and exclusivity which they
were provided by the state. Moreover, the traditional campus-based model of
delivery is proving to be unsustainable. Institutions of tertiary education are
now in an environment of competition. The players are: conventional state
universities, conventional private universities, conventional state community
colleges and institutes, private non-university tertiary institutions, open
universities, virtual universities, web-based non-formal programs, etc. Despite
all the wishful thinking, these institutions will not reach a deliberate
agreement on a division of labor. The name of the game is competition in which
the determining elements are:
Quality
Efficiency
Cost-effectiveness
Relevance
Convenience
Prestige
The relative value of these
factors varies by individuals, markets and countries.
The world is experiencing a real revolution in the dissemination of knowledge and in the enhancement of instruction, through the advancement of information and communication technologies (ICTs). This is the third revolution in learning, the first being the invention of the written language and the second being the development of moveable type and books. ICTs make both the content of learning and the interactions of high-quality (and other) instruction affordable and available anytime, anywhere.
Many providers are now trying
to exploit the potential of ICTs for education, inspired by the success of ICTs
in revolutionizing commerce, business and entertainment. There are now virtual
universities and virtual programs provided by campus-based universities. About 60% of U.S. universities provide
virtual education programs. In addition, open universities expand opportunities
to populations that traditionally have been excluded from education due to
geographic, cultural, and social barriers.
Virtual education provides a
significant supplement to the existing campus institutions by broadening
learning opportunities and offering more flexible options. It can also meet the
need for individual enrichment, skill upgrading, and lifelong education. There
are at least three institutional models to explore: (1) dual-mode, which offers
both classroom instruction and virtual education programs; (2) single-mode,
which is a wholly dedicated virtual learning institution; and (3) international
partnership mode, under which an external provider of virtual education
programs enters into partnership with local tertiary institutions to offer
these programs on a joint basis.
Virtual education can serve
many purposes:
It
provides opportunities to students who are unable to attend regular
institutions because of a wide range of reasons including travel, medical
conditions, or careers. It also offers opportunities to students
who need remedial work.
A
virtual program can also provide courses that small rural or urban institutions
cannot offer to their students for lack of staff or resources. Such courses
utilize already developed multimedia materials and share one “teacher” among
several institutions. Alternatively, retired or part-time teachers who
live hundreds of miles away can be used to teach the online course.
Two different questions are
at issue here. One is the issue of
expanding reach, where virtual education programs try to serve a clientele
whose needs are difficult or impossible to meet through on-site learning. The other is whether virtual education can
be a substitute for on-site, campus-based institutions. On-site institutions that are vibrant with research,
exploration, and intellectual discourse are irreplaceable. The personal contact with peers and with
teachers in a good on-site institution is incomparable in its richness. Libraries, possibly obsolete in a not-too
distant future, still serve as an unmatched resource for investigation and
learning. Virtual learning, on the
other hand, provides opportunities for those who could not attend courses on
campus because of cost and time constraints.
Virtual learning increasingly provides rapid and personal interaction;
it can provide more reliable learning materials than inferior institutions; it
is generally far lower in terms of cost to the student, and often offers more
for lower capital and recurrent costs.
On the other hand, virtual education should not be a
poor replica of conventional education. With the potential of technology it
could be a prototype of a more exciting and effective model. Classrooms are
constrained environments, and conventional instructional materials are
static. If virtual education programs are taped classrooms, digital
texts, and PowerPoint transparencies, then we are missing out on the tremendous
potential of technologies that can animate, simulate, capture reality, add
movement to static concepts, and extend our touch to the whole universe. The
challenge, therefore, is to align learning technologies with sound pedagogy and
instructional design and to try to do with virtual systems of delivery what
could not be done with conventional modes.
Virtual learning multimedia
packages are excellent instructional aides to engage students in the learning
process. They make use of the best specialists and experts who develop them and
make them available to learners anywhere, anytime. They provide opportunities
for independent pursuit of knowledge - on demand. They can connect learners
with other learners to exchange information and perform collaborative programs.
They may be the most cost-effective (and in some cases the only) means of
bringing the wide world into the realm of the learner.
The demands and concerns
facing tertiary education and the institutional responses in terms of changes
in the objectives, landscape, focus, and modes of delivery are creating new
realities and dynamics. They seem to be leading to new experiments, modalities
and structures in tertiary education, with different degrees of innovation and
break with the past. We may be heading towards a multidimensional landscape of
tertiary education institutions – each serving a different clientele and a
different purpose. The components of
the conventional model are slowly evolving into a new paradigm, which may be
depicted as follows (Table 1):
Table 1 Evolution of the New Paradigm
|
From |
To |
|
A campus |
A knowledge infrastructure (buildings,
labs, radio, television, Internet, museums…) |
|
Classrooms |
Individual learners |
|
A teacher (as provider of
knowledge) |
A teacher (as a tutor and
facilitator) |
|
A set of textbooks and some
audiovisual aids |
Multimedia materials (print,
audio, video, digital...) |
In this paradigm tertiary education will not be a location anymore, but an activity: a teaching/learning activity that can take place in different contexts, locations and times for different objectives, clienteles and occasions. Imagine a highly interactive, synchronous and asynchronous, multimedia learning experience between distant locations over vast national and international networks, allowing learners to obtain on-site as well as simultaneous distance learning services from their geographically dispersed organizations, schools, and other colleagues. In this new paradigm, new technologies will not be a substitute for schooling; they will constitute one integral element of this education model—supplementing and enriching traditional institutions, delivery systems, and instructional materials.
The evolving tertiary
education environment with its new realities, dynamics and innovations and its
ambitious global agendas, is inhibited in many countries and institutions by
countervailing constraints. A summary of the major constraints follow:
Most tertiary education
institutions and systems are conservative. They also cherish their independence
and value their intrinsic wisdom. Many of them are supply driven and are not
well attuned to the challenges, demands and transformations occurring outside
their walls. They are governed by the momentum of past objectives, approaches
and modalities and are passive vis-à-vis the global agendas of the present and
future. These institutions and systems will find themselves outdated in a
changing world and defeated in a competitive environment.
Many countries and
institutions lack the expertise to identify issues, formulate and evaluate
policy options, generate plans, and implement measures. Even when such
expertise is available, the connection with global trends, agendas and
experiences is ad hoc and weak. Such capacity needs to be built and connected
with international networks for access to and exchange of knowledge,
experience, and expertise.
ICTs are a major component of
the globalized knowledge-based economy and a significant element in the global
agendas. Despite dramatic increase in availability of ICTs, there are still
many groups that do not have access to these technologies. Until recently, most
ICTs depended on electric power and telephone lines. Other sources of energy
(e.g. solar) and technologies (wireless, radio, and satellite) offer new
opportunities for access bypassing the traditional technologies. Cost is
another constraint, and many groups have developed intermediate, simple and
inexpensive technologies such as community radio (suitcase) transmitters,
wind-up radios, solar powered instruments, and low-cost internet connectivity
such as Vita-connect and VSAT satellite dishes.
Providing hardware and connectivity
is necessary but not sufficient. What is lacking and needed is contentware that
is curriculum-related, well designed, user-friendly and inexpensive. If this
contentware is not available, collaborative schemes among institutions to
develop such multimedia materials will lower cost and pool expertise.
The demand for more and
different tertiary education is increasing, yet the financial resources are not
increasing in the same proportion. Part of this constraint is self-inflicted
because the conventional model for tertiary education is not sustainable.
Some mechanisms to deal with
the financial constraint are:
Mobilization
of funds from diverse sources
Experimenting
with and developing sustainable tertiary education models, including
collaborative schemes
Extensive
use of ICTs and multimedia materials to achieve efficiencies and realize
economies of scale and expertise.
Tertiary education systems
and institutions are operating in an exciting and challenging time, at the
intersection of high global and local demands, high hope derived from the
technological and pedagogical revolutions, and constraining human,
technological and financial capacities.
What happens next depends on attitude and action:
Global
trends can be denied, or faced solo, or confronted collectively
Global
agendas can be ignored or taken seriously
through examination, dialogue, experimentation and collaboration
Global
constraints can be a source of despair and self-pity or an incentive for
creativity, innovation and action.
The trends, the agendas and
the constraints are global but the choice is local and individual.